You’re not wrong on that last point actually haha. Seems like 20 years since a PM didn’t get knifed in the back and actually completed a term!
That the view is also held by “neo Nazis” does not mean it is a neo-Nazi view. If neo-Nazis believe the earth is round does that make anyone that thinks the earth is round a neo-Nazi? No.
I have no tolerance for Nazis. Not every belief that a Nazi holds is an offensive belief, as I just showed. Saying that a welcome to country at the Anzac ceremony is disrespectful to the ANZACs who fought and died for this country is NOT a Nazi belief. That’s absolutely ridiculous.
Where’s this list of neo-Nazi beliefs btw? I was going to make a thread on the NRL channel about how the season and teams are looking so far, but I think I’d better check what the official Neo-Nazi position is on the Broncos performances before I do. I wonder if the neo-Nazis believe that the instant sin-bin for high shots is ruining games regularly, because if so I’d better not say that one, wouldn’t want to be banned for holding a neo-Nazi belief. Which hot chips do the neo-Nazis believe are the best? I’m a red rooster kinda guy, but I don’t want to be a neo-Nazi if that’s what their official position is as well.
Revoking my mod permission over this is beyond an abuse of power. Ban away.
What do you mean by that?
“Cis” just means “not trans”, which is entirely unnecessary.
Biological sex is absolutely binary. There is male and female. Intersex is a group of genetic conditions/defects called Difference of Sexual Development (DSDs for short) that affect males and females. ie you’re a male who has 46 XY 5-ARD (like Olympian Caster Semenya), or a female who has 46 XX. You’re not a different sex, you’re not both sexes - you’re one of the 2 sexes with a DSD. No DSD exists where a person can ever produce both gamete types.
Mods deleted that persons comment so I can’t see what they said, but I’m assuming they used something like the Oxford Dictionary definition:
female (adjective)
- of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes:
This covers all “cis” women and excludes all “trans” women.
“A woman is someone that says they are a woman” is circular. It is not a valid definition. You can’t use the word you’re defining in its own definition.
It’s absolutely a bad definition, and it’s not the correct one which does include every single “cis” woman and exclude every single biological male.
From the Oxford dictionary:
female (adjective)
- of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes:
Women who can’t bear offspring or produce eggs? Covered. Men? Excluded.
There absolute is a definition that includes all edge cases. From the Oxford dictionary:
female (adjective)
- of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes
There is no edge case that isn’t covered here. Women who cannot bear offspring or produce eggs are still of the sex that can.
A literal internet search of the word female gives you the answer that supposedly doesn’t exist lol.
Cross dressing != transgender.
I’m pretty sure equating the two is considered transphobic or homophobic or one of the phobics.
It’s because it is still going through the courts.
It’s also still just a rumour.
The first amendment doesn’t prevent visas being revoked for your speech. Immigration laws operate under a different framework, always have. Visas can be cancelled for things that visa holders say, such as showing support for designated terrorist organisations, hates speech, etc.
You don’t have to be convicted or even accused of a crime to have a visa cancelled. This isn’t new, but should it be a surprise to anyone. They don’t have a right to a visa not being cancelled.
The visa cancellation and subsequent deportation can be challenged in court if they disagree. That’s how the system has always worked. Trump didn’t change anything there.
You’re mistaking me defending the truth and common sense as “trying to defend Donald trump”. The president or party is irrelevant to me, they’re not my president or party. I’ve done nothing but calmly and clearly explain what has happened based on all available information, but people just can’t see past their hatred for their political opposition. This situation has literally nothing to do with trump.
When migrants have their parole cancelled they are ordered to leave or be deported. That’s the process. That’s the law. They don’t need to have a court case to decide if they’re to be deported because they’re there on a temporary visa that is a legal document that they’ve agreed to the terms and conditions.
Now some previous administrations clearly chose to ignore this process and let them stay indefinitely, but that doesn’t mean that the law changed or went away.
Also using “wannabe dictator” as if it is a fact is the exact type of attitude that leads to so many of you on here treating everyone that doesn’t think exactly the same as hostile and a “nazi” etc. It’s not a good starting position, it’s bad faith, and it’s not at all conducive to good and meaningful discussion.
Top tier trolling by the trump organisation tbh.
Also constitutional amendments are a thing. They can, through the correct processes, attempt to get an amendment to allow it.
As an Australian I’ve long wondered why they haven’t changed it so a president can have more than 2 terms. At the end of the day who the president is matters significantly less than which party forms government. The president can do basically nothing by himself, as we’re seeing with every thing trump attempts to do being blocked and tied up in courts.
Here in Australia there’s no limit to how many terms a prime minister can serve because it makes no sense to arbitrarily limit it. Wouldn’t all the left have loved it if Obama could have run again? He was a born leader and was an absolute pleasure to watch. Where would the harm have been? Is there actually a reason that makes sense in modern times?
A heckler was. Singular. He wasn’t the only one, and he definitely isn’t the only one who found it incredibly disrespectful and insulting. One person doing X being a Y does not make everyone doing X a Y.
At another Anzac ceremony the self proclaimed “tolerant” people were shouting “free Palestine”. What are your thoughts on that?
Also this “the ABC understands a group of far right were present” thing is just typical media garbage, unverified and put there purely to stoke the outrage flames from their target audience. Also they likely consider anyone who voted “no” to the voice “far right”, so it’s a meaningless biased comment made to get a reaction.
Why do we need to acknowledge the “traditional owners” at every football match or work training seminar exactly? The company I work at spends an insane amount of money paying for AoC/WtC dozens of times per week. It’s beyond ridiculous.
There is no need to ever be welcomed or acknowledge it more than once. It’s turned into a massive financial grift.
And no matter what you say, constantly having to be “welcomed“ to the place that we were born, our parents were born, and their parents were born, absolutely is being treated as if we don’t belong here and need their permission.
Again - what need is there for me to be “welcomed” to the city I was born and grew up in even once a month? Why do I have to regularly acknowledge that people lived here before me? I’m not where I am because of anything they did.
Ah yes, the classic talking points of….checks notes…. saying the conservative partys policies are bad. Interesting take. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that you disagree that immigration is a factor in the housing crisis, right?
The deductible interest idea is actually a good idea, not just for first home buyers but for all mortgages. It massively helps ease cost of living pressure that is brought on by interest rates on housing. Many countries already do this btw.
Home ownership doesn’t attract obscene tax benefits.
You know what is an absurd tax? Land tax, which you’re advocating for making a standard and increasing.
Let me guess - you think communism works, it just hasn’t been done properly yet?
Land tax doesn’t address those things. Land tax is a constant tax on something you already own. Land tax harms every home owner, including the poorest of them. That should never have even been allowed, let alone have anyone advocating for it to be expanded. Being low compliance and broad based doesn’t mean it’s right.
It should not cost $28k in fees to then buy a fully compliant off the shelf tiny home. It has absolutely nothing to do with maintaining living standards. 28k in application fees makes it an expensive exercise, sometimes doubling the cost of the dwelling you want to put there. That is absolutely absurd.
The best solutions are to stop foreign ownership completely, massively cut immigration temporarily (importing a million people a year when we have a housing supply crisis is literally pouring fuel on the fire), limit how many properties someone can own, remove negative gearing, and slash lots of red tape and costs associated with building multiple homes on peoples land.
Annual land tax should not be a thing. You bought it, it’s yours. Paying a “land tax” forever means you’re just renting the land with extra steps.
As you touched on, they need to completely rewrite the book on tiny homes etc. I want to build a granny flat/tiny home on my property to move my parents in to and sell their house. To do so, my council charges something stupid like $28k in non refundable application fees. I could pay $28k to apply to build a granny flat and they deny it and keep all that money. That is absurd. I’m trying to get a property sold and re-house my parents onto my land, and the council is telling me to get fucked, basically.
Of the 2, the LNPs tax deductible interest is the much better plan. It definitely could help, but it does nothing to make housing for affordable.
The ALP plan also does nothing to make houses affordable.
Both parties are trying to maintain the housing markets perpetually increasing prices because if the bubble were to burst it would be catastrophic. It’s getting to catastrophic levels if it doesn’t burst though, but wealthy politicians who own multiple homes and are set for life don’t care about this type of catastrophe, only the former one.
Interesting that in an article about issues with housing supply there is no mention of the unsustainable population increase via record levels of immigration.
It’s just not necessary in my and many other people’s opinion, especially to do every day or at every single event. It is especially not necessary at an ANZAC ceremony that is about remembering the ultimate sacrifice that those men and women made fighting for this country - our country.
Doing it every day at things like daycare is a whole other issue. While you say it teaches respect, it can be argued that it is furthering racial divide, instilling into people who’s families have lived here for hundreds of years that it’s not their country and that they need to ask for permission to be here.
It’s becoming more and more divisive precisely because it is being pushed and pushed and pushed in ever increasing numbers. Next it’ll have to be performed every morning at every McDonald’s when they open. After the “voice” referendum was voted down in a significant way, it seems the losing side has doubled down on trying to push through their agenda that was clearly not popular, and people are rightly getting fed up.
Seems at least one admin of this instance disagrees lol. Just had moderator status taken off me for completely unrelated subs and threatened with a ban - which is coming whenever he sees my reply - because apparently thinking that doing a “welcome to country” at an ANZAC ceremony is disrespectful to the ANZACS is a verified and official Neo-Nazi belief, even if it’s shared by millions of non-neo-Nazis, and as such is worthy of stripping moderator status and threatening a ban lol.
https://aussie.zone/comment/16252130
Disgraceful. I bet he is absolutely on board with Albo now wanting to charge anyone who boos at a welcome to country with a hate crime and send them to jail for 5 years.
I never, not once, not even remotely suggested that there was no “real neo-nazi there”. I’m not an idiot, I know there are racist fucking dipshits here. I never said there wasn’t. I said that you can’t label everyone that booed or that thought the WtC was disrespectful as a neo-Nazi, which should not be a controversial comment.
It is apparently though. Any view that a neo-Nazi has is off limits, even if they share the same view as everyone else. Thinking Albanese has been a terrible PM is probably a neo-Nazi view that’s worthy of having mod status removed and threatened to be banned, because neo-Nazis would definitely think he is a shitty PM. Better watch out you don’t criticise Albo or you’re a neo-Nazi!
Lemmy really is speed running to 2020s reddit lol. Mod the ever loving fuck out of anyone that doesn’t toe the echo chamber line, label everything you don’t agree with as “misinformation”, and just ban everyone anonymously so it doesn’t show in the mod log who did it and use the intentionally vague “trolling, bad faith, misinformation” BS reason lol.
Thought this instances was at least a bit less ideologically captured and as an Aussie one I thought it wouldn’t be censor central, but seems like certain mods have just woken from their slumber of never commenting in years and are now turning the censorship machine on. Seriously, check out their post/comment history.